Welcome!

Whether you know me or not, are just looking
or a regular follower, I hope you will find this blog helpful.
Comments and feedback always welcome!



Sunday, May 12, 2013

Why we need to preach on Romans 13

We've been spending the last few weeks working through Romans 12 and 13. We started on the morning of our annual church meetings looking at what it means to be the body of Christ. We thought how we belong to God, and how we belong to each other, and how the hallmark of our life together is love - love for God, love for each other, love for the wider world, including those who persecute us. The material on Romans 12 was very specific to our particular church circumstances, but I offer these latest sermons on Romans 13 as more general teaching, looking at love in the wider world, and love in light of Christ's coming. As so often happens, the more you get into God's word, the more relevant it becomes to your present situation, and this has certainly been the case here.

In the West we haven't had to think too much about the limits of our submission to the authorities for a long, long time. We have generally admired the steadfastness of our brothers and sisters in Christ around the world, but never really stopped to think what we can learn from them. But with the sexual revolution becoming institutionalised by governments, we are going to have to respond clearly and quickly to the developing situation. As norms of behaviour are imposed which run contrary to gospel teaching, we need to know how to promote basic Christian holiness, and to teach the urgency of living in light of Christ's return. Yet at the same time we need to hold true to the essential command of Christ to love our neighbour as ourselves. How do we do this?

I am not sure I have the answer. But preparing the sermons certainly got me thinking...

Romans 13:1-7

Romans 13:8-14

Monday, April 15, 2013

What do we mean by the North South divide?

There was an excellent post by Nick Baines recently on the death of Mrs Thatcher. But one little point just jarred with me slightly, and it's one that many commentators have used  - namely the "North-South divide". It's very easy to use simplistic terms. As the report from the Church Urban Fund points out, there are in every part of the country affluent areas not far from extremely deprived areas.

But more importantly one legacy of the "Thatcher revolution" was to create a service and finance economy based predominantly round London and the South-East of England. This has had the effect of skewing the economic profile of the whole nation, as this post by the BBC economics editor, Stephanie Flanders, makes clear. However in the deep south-west, out on the peninsula, we hardly share in the wealth and prosperity of the Home Counties. An article in today's Western Morning News highlights the problems the region faces, exacerbated by poor transport links and few major employers.

So, yes, I do not downplay the real problems faced by those up north, where the challenges of deprivation are stark indeed. But could we just change the language a little, and talk of something like a "London and the regions" divide? Unless we do, I fear that the problems in this area are going to remain downplayed and unaddressed.

Monday, April 01, 2013

All about Jesus - a sermon on Luke 24:1-12

There is a story about John Wayne who was cast as a Roman centurion in one of those old-fashioned Biblical epics. When the time came, he delivered his line perfectly: "Truly, this was the son of God". But the director felt something was lacking. "John, could we have a bit more awe?" So the Duke delivered his line again: "Aw, truly this was the son of God".

Now we are here this morning to remember the events of Easter Day. Many of us are already very familiar with what happened all those years ago. It is a story which perhaps we have known since we were very little. But the question I want to ask is this: what effect does the Easter story have on you? Are we are in this service simply rehearsing our lines or does it fill with us wonder and awe?

Yesterday it was the Devon derby between Plymouth Argyle and Exeter City. Over 13000 people crammed into Home Park. From what I heard on the radio and in my back garden I couldn't doubt the passion and the commitment of all those present. The sight of 22 men playing against each other in a League Two football match stirred up deep emotions, and nothing was more important to the watching fans than who ended up winning. 

How would it be if today there were 13000 people across Plymouth who were passionate about the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ? If our churches were crammed with people filled with awe and wonder at the events of that first Easter?

Maybe we need to go back and remind ourselves who is this Jesus we are celebrating today. Now there is much, more that could be said about Jesus than I can cover in a single sermon, but I want to highlight three particular points about Jesus that particularly come out of the Easter story…

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Good Friday and the Body of Christ

There is no escaping from the brutal physical reality of Good Friday. Nails, wood, thorns, flesh all combine in a shocking and vicious form of punishment that sadly bears only one witness to the many forms of inhumanity man perpetrates on man. It can be so easy when you have been walking with the Lord for some time to become insensitive to the sheer cruelty of the events that day, or maybe skip over the details straight into the joy and wonder of Easter Day. Good Friday is a time to stop and ponder that blackness which lies deep within the human soul. You may call it sin. You may call it your genetic predisposition. Call it what you will, it lurks within each of us.

And yet Good Friday is far more than simply a demonstration of man’s inhumanity to man. In fact the gospel writers are remarkably restrained about the physical aspects of Jesus’ suffering. For here is a man whose nature is so attractive and so compelling that our focus is drawn away from the hard, practical details to the extraordinary force of love that He reveals even to the end. Here is a man who even while He is being crucified prays: Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing (Luke 24:34). Here is a man who turns to His mother and His beloved disciple and says: Dear woman, here is your son…here is your mother (John 19:26,27). Here is a man who says to the penitent thief: I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise (Luke 23:43).

Today we rightly focus on Jesus, on His suffering and His love. And it is so easy to recast Good Friday in terms of our own individual piety or personal devotion. But we need also to pause and consider what the death of our Lord Jesus Christ means for our life as a church. Because even as we think about the body of Jesus pierced and broken we need to ponder and think what it means to say: We are the body of Christ. Even as we think about the depths of Jesus’ love as He bears the weight of our sin and the wrath that should have been ours, we need to ponder and think what it means to obey Jesus command: Love each other as I have loved you. (John 15:12).

And when we do that, I believe we will begin to see that the body of Christ is not a religious club, or an institution that meets only on a Sunday. It is a group of people who have been called and chosen by God to pattern their lives according to the cross. So as Jesus’ body was broken and pierced, we too are called to be a physical presence that will often appear suffering and weak. As Jesus revealed the sheer abundance of God’s love even as He was nailed to a cross, we too are called to love the hardened soldier, the grieving mother, the thief, even when we ourselves are grieving and suffering.

But we cannot do this in our own strength. A church may become more successful by better organisation or more prudent management. But that does not necessarily mean it will truly operate as the body of Christ. If we are to be the body of Christ we need above all else to animated by the Spirit of Christ. That’s why one of the first things Jesus did when he appeared in the Upper Room was to breathe on His disciples and say: Receive the Holy Spirit (John 20:22). This was more than a foretaste of Pentecost. It was teaching the disciples that they, and we, are called to share in the life, death and resurrection of our Saviour at the very deepest level. Jesus is to be our pattern, our passion, our inspiration. But this is only possible if we are constantly filled by the Spirit of the One who humbled Himself even to death on a cross (see Philippians 2:1-13).

So this Good Friday by all means reflect what Jesus’ death means for you personally. But also reflect that by faith we become members of the body of this same Christ. Because it is at the cross that revival in the most genuine sense takes place, when churches collectively respond to the death of Jesus, and open themselves to become His body, animated by His Spirit, living out His commands. Whatever the cost. Whatever the consequences. Whatever God calls us to become.

Friday, March 22, 2013

Enthronement sermons

There is little doubt this has been a momentous week in the history of the Western Church. It's not often you get the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury preaching their inaugural sermons in the same week. It's also quite remarkable that the Archbishop quoted the Pope in his sermon. Two men who have a radical vision and promise real change - we need to pray that neither are crushed by the institution, beaten down by the politics or stifled by the bureaucracy.

It is in fact a real education to compare the two sermons:

Pope Francis Inaugural Homily

Archbishop Justin's Inaugural Sermon

Both reveal a deep desire to make the Christian faith challenging, relevant and accessible. Of course as an evangelical I am a lot more comfortable with the Archbishop's focus on the person of Jesus, rather than the pope's focus on the saints. But both are aimed to inspire genuine renewal and transformation in the life of the church and beyond, and again we need to pray that their message is heeded. Perhaps this week really is the day of small beginnings.

It's also quite instructive to compare Archbishop Justin's sermon with the enthronement sermon of Archbishop Rowan. While there are many points of contact, I find it striking to compare Archbishop Justin's image of walking on the water towards Jesus, and Archbishop Rowan image of swimming in the full flood of divine love. A subtle change of emphasis, perhaps, but an important one nonetheless.

Saturday, March 09, 2013

The difference between cats and dogs

It's quite simple ...

Dogs get their own television channel

Cats get their own cafe.

Says it all really.

Friday, March 08, 2013

The bitter fruit of postmodernism

Two articles today stood out for me on the blogosphere.

The first by Archbishop Welby concerned reconciliation in the church:

http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/pages/blog.html

The second from the Gospel Coalition concerned the lack of communication in the marriage debate:

http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2013/03/07/the-new-fight-for-marriage/

What do the two articles have in common? It seems to me that the problem stems from a basic use of language, that one person uses a word in a completely different sense to another. So the divisions in the Anglican Communion are caused, for example, by the use of the term "gospel". What is gospel to one is anathema to another.

Equally in the debate about marriage, the proponent of same-sex unions will use the term "marriage" in a completely different context from someone advocating the traditional understanding.

It seems to me that we have reaped the fruits of postmodernism. While deconstructing texts in an academic context may be fun, in a social context the results are disastrous. Once revelation has been left behind, and authorial intent subverted, then there is no longer any possible means of having a social consensus.

Unfortunately the church itself has become so infected with this disease, it cannot bear witness to a credible alternative. I do not mean that the church should simply be the guardian of inherited tradition, but that it would faithfully proclaim the gospel "entrusted once for all to the saints" to each new generation. However faithful proclamation does not produce theology degrees, and we have ended up with a muddle that compromises our ability to speak clearly on any given subject.

Indeed the question the conflict in the Anglican Communion raises the question even of what the word "reconciliation" means. It will be interesting to see how Archbishop Welby develops his thinking - certainly he needs all our prayers.